Distinguish spending restrictions from a judgment-defaulter listing, and challenge errors through the court

Applying costs nothing. Ask the enforcement court which provision was used, and gather proof of compliance or an effective guarantee. Necessary living or business spending may require a separate application each time. Repeated applications and visits take persistence.

The six listing grounds are refusal despite ability to comply; obstruction through forged evidence, violence, or threats; evasion through sham litigation, arbitration, or asset concealment or transfer; breach of asset-reporting duties; breach of a spending restriction; and unjustified refusal to perform an enforcement settlement. Sufficient effective security, or already seized or frozen assets sufficient to discharge the obligation, prevents listing on the first ground. Minors must not be listed. The rules provide a two-year term for specified grounds, extendable by one to three years for serious violent or threatening obstruction or multiple dishonest acts. Seven removal situations include completed performance, completed settlement performance, and relevant court termination orders; removal must occur within three working days when the conditions apply. Active performance or correction can support early deletion. The cited 2010 spending-restriction text lists eight categories: air travel, soft-sleeper rail travel, or ship cabins at second class or above; high spending at star-rated hotels, nightclubs, or golf courses; buying real estate or building, expanding, or luxuriously renovating a home; renting high-end offices, hotels, or apartments for business; buying vehicles not needed for business; travel and holidays; children’s high-fee private schooling; and high-premium insurance or investment products. Necessary living or business expenditure within a restricted category requires prior court approval. Effective security or the enforcing creditor’s consent can support lifting the restriction.

The consumption rules were amended in 2015 by Judicial Interpretation 2015 No. 17 and retitled to include related consumption. The original author verified the 2010 text on the court website; the amended text remains unverified because the gazette page returned a 502 error. The eight-category list above is therefore the cited historical text, not a substitute for checking the current order. A listing, a spending restriction, and a credit report are three different things; removal from one does not automatically change the others. See rebuilding after enforcement. The source distinguishes spending from the debtor’s property from a spouse’s or child’s independently earned money, but using the debtor’s funds for high-fee private schooling is expressly restricted.

Supreme People’s Court (amended 2017). Provisions on publication of judgment-defaulter information, Articles 1–4 and 10. https://www.court.gov.cn/fabu/xiangqing/37182.html; Supreme People’s Court (2010). Provisions restricting high consumption by persons subject to enforcement, Articles 3, 8, and 9. https://www.court.gov.cn/shenpan/xiangqing/1650.html.