Time & energyIdea 17 · 2 min read

Set defaults for low-stakes choices such as clothes and meals

Grade C evidenceValue: ModerateDebated
In plain language

Strong evidence is lacking. The claim that choices deplete a finite supply of willpower failed in two large, multi-laboratory replications involving roughly two and three thousand people. Defaults may still save minutes and indecision, without “conserving willpower.”

MoneyNo cost
TimeQuick and easy
EffortLittle effort

What it takes

Free. Spend a little time choosing your defaults initially.

What you may gain

The gain cannot be quantified. Original ego-depletion experiments proposed a shared limited resource consumed by choices and self-control. Two preregistered multi-laboratory replications did not reproduce the effect: 23 laboratories with 2,141 people found d=0.04, 95% CI [−0.07, 0.15]; 36 laboratories with 3,531 people found d=0.06. These were negligible differences.

Context & considerations

Popular accounts often present decision fatigue as settled despite repeated replication failures. Defaults remain inexpensive and save real time. Do not expect them to improve afternoon judgment through a proven willpower mechanism.

Research & references

Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Muraven & Tice (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252 ; Hagger et al. (2016). A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616652873 ; Vohs et al. (2021). A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797621989733